page 3
Print This Page
January 2006
Page 2      
Critical Mess by Raphael Rubinstein
Recently Read: Art Criticism
A Critical Mess Reaches Critical Mass
reviewed by Shawn Rossiter

In the March 2003 edition of Art in America, Raphael Rubinstein, a senior editor of the magazine as well as poet and art critic, lamented the state of contemporary art criticism in an article entitled "A Quiet Crisis." In the 15 Bytes edition of that month, Rubinstein's article served as a launching pad for my own short discussion of the position and problems of criticism in our community and in this publication. Some months later, I received an email from Rubinstein, who I imagine had googled his article to see what type of response it had engendered, thanking me for my attention to his thoughts.

I was not the only one who noticed the Art in America article, and now, three years later, Rubinstein has edited a new book entitled Critical Mess: Art Critics on the State of their Practice published by Hard Press Editions, that brings together articles by thirteen art critics on the state of art criticism (the omission of my own response was surely a clerical error).

Though several of the contributors to this volume, including the editor himself, use the term "crisis" when discussing the state of criticism, Rubinstein chose the more inert "mess" for his title because, as he writes, "a crisis is a condition brought on by an act of will, by a decision taken. It is someone's fault. A "mess," on the other hand, just happens, mostly through inaction -- no one is to blame.”

While no one may be to blame, Rubinstein does see the mess of art criticism as a reflection of "the mess that is contemporary art." Others in this volume also speak disparingly of contemporary art, even while they make their practice in its sphere. Peter Plagens is pessimistic about the whole scene: "Contemporary art has abandoned its function as the visual wing of the house of poetry and has morphed into a fecklessly transgressive subdivision of the entertainment industry. It's now commercial pop culture writ esoteric, whiney, and small."

A common thread throughout many of these essays is the struggle in criticism between the house of poetry and the house of theory. The latter takes a good beating by many of the authors. Michael Duncan decries the thesis writers who churn out "trivial observations pumped by theory to masquerade as ideas." Carter Ratcliffe believes the theorists have done damage to the culture of art by the audience they have created, one that is "adolescent, panting to keep up with new wrinkles in the orthodoxy, as if they were fads manufactured by the entertainment industry." Nancy Princenthal dates the current crisis in art criticism to the emergence of Artforum and the development of theoretical art criticism that gets weighed down in jargon and too often does not directly engage the art which should be its subject

One of the few dissenting voices in this struggle of the houses is Thomas McEvilley, whose 1994 essay, "The Tomb of the Zombie," is the sole essay not written within the past few years. A reconstruction of remarks made by the author at the Congress of the International Association of Art Critics in Stockholm in September 1994, the essay expresses McEvilly's observation that art critics are almost completely ignored by other writers in the arena of cultural discourse. "It seems to me that there is an implication of a certain contempt for our profession in this cavalier treatment of our subject matter by these mighty intellectuals form outside the walls of our ghetto, and I think we deserve it." McEvilley blames this sad situation on a modernist tradition of value judgment (the Kantian-Greenberg tradition of criticism). As a remedy, he urges an emphasis on analysis rather than appreciation, a postmodern (rather than anti-modern, which he says came immediately after modernism and merely replaced one orthodoxy with its evil twin) recognition of appreciation -- that it is personal and conditioned and has nothing to do with absolutes -- of art that stresses analysis so as to make the appreciation of art open to the public rather than confined to an initiated elite.

Lane Relyea, on the other hand, says a pox on both your houses. Modernists fail to connect what they "feel," to the outside world, in his opinion, while the postmodernist tradition has become impotent in its tenured ease. "What's left is a postmodernist view of the system that isn't so much critical as conformist, and a modernist model of the self that's too incapacitated and dim-witted to act," Relyea writes.

Relyea's vitriolic language is symptomatic of these essays, where it seems that critics, normally resigned to discussing art they like, give full literary vent to their pent up frustrations; so that if you're looking for a perfectly keen turn of phrase to describe that recent trend in art or the art world that you just can't stand, Critical Mess is a gold mine.

Another recurrent theme in these essays is the observation/lament that the critic simply no longer matters. Michael Duncan notes that no one reads anymore, that "all reviews are endorsements" where the buzz created by column width is more important than the comments in the column. James Elkins, whose "What Happened to Art Criticism" was published at the same time as Rubinstein's article and is in accord with the latter's contention that critics are avoiding value judgements, finds that criticism's voice has "become very weak, and it is dissolving into the background clutter of ephemeral cultural criticism." The paradox of criticism, in Elkins words, is that "it's dying, but it's everywhere . . . Art criticism is massively produced and massively ignored."

The dissipated cultural importance of criticism has affected the writers in the art world. JJ Charlesworth sees the malaise of contemporary art critics rooted in "the pessimistic uncertainty about the cultural purpose of evaluation," and notes that art criticism has slipped into art writing, an enfeebled cousin that instead of debating one theoretical approach to another discusses the ethics of the relationship between artists and writer.

The essays here reveal that the mess is indeed real. To his credit, Rubinstein has gathered a series of intelligent and articulate voices, many of whom disagree with each other. In his introduction, Rubinstein recognizes that his collection is an extremely New York-centric selection, Michael Duncan's essay being the only west coast example; and that he consciously restricted himself to the United States, though he can envision a global collection along the same lines. None of the essays is long and there is no lineage or order to follow so that the book can be enjoyed like a box of chocolates, choosing one essay at random each sitting; you may not like the coconut cream you end up with, but there is sure to be a raspberry filled gem to your liking.

Critical Mess: Art Critics on the State of their Practice
Raphael Rubinstein
Publisher: Hard Press Editions
ISBN-10: 1889097675
Paperback: 125 pages

But it now at

Artist of Utah News
About You?

Over the past 12 months, the number of 15 Bytes subscribers has increased by more than 35%. So, we'd like to take a moment to get to know who you are, what you like and how we can improve 15 Bytes. Please take a moment to fill out the following survey. We will publish the results in our February edition.

15 BYTES SURVEY -- January 2007

I live in:

I am a:
Professional Artist
Amateur Artist
Art Lover
Art Professional

When 15 BYTES comes out I read:

Entire issue
A few pages
One or two articles

I have been reading 15 BYTES:
A month or two
Over six months
Over a year
Since the beginning

I click on the links in 15 Bytes:
Almost never

I print out 15 Bytes:

In addition to our reviews and spotlights, we publish a number of special features. Please let us know how much you enjoy them/read them by ranking them on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high).

Studio Space (usually on page 2) :

5 4 3
2 1

On the Spot (usually on page 2) :
5 4 3 2 1

Recently Read (book reviews) :
5 4 3 2 1

Mixed Media (usually on page 10) :
5 4 3 2 1

Alder's Accounts (usually on page 5) :
5 4 3 2 1

Would you be interested in a Hints 'n Tips column, for both artists and collectors?

How are we doing covering the entire state?
Needs some work

Recently we have had articles that have branched outside of Utah. What do you think?
Stick to covering Utah only
Okay, but keep it within reason

Other comments:

Once you have sent your survey you will be taken back to this page.

1. What hangs above your mantel?

"1928 International Truck " 24x30 by Utah Painter, Ron Russon

2. What was the most memorable exhibit you've seen recently?

Harvey Dunn, "The Original Donation" at the South Dakota Art Museum; a powerful exhibit of prarie and homesteader paintings painted by an artist painting what he loved. Talk about "painting from the gut!" And then he donated them all to the University.

3. What is your favorite building in Utah?

The Provo Library (old BYU Academy); my favorite building for sentimental reasons of it being an old college hangout place for me during my BYU days. Plus, I love the idea of restoring an old building and making it useful again. And who doesn't love a library? Who doesn't love books?
A native of the West, John Berry left a career as an Illustrator to become a full-time painter. He lives in Cache Valley and paints the western landscape he has known since his youth. He maintains a blog here where you can see old works, works in progress and postcard size paintings like the one above.

The January 2007 edition:

Tom Alder is a banker by day but in his free time explores his interest in Utah art. He is on the board of the Museum of Utah Art and History, organizes the yearly Zion's Bank Art Show, and is currently working on a Masters Thesis on Henri Moser.

Cara Despain has a BFA from the University of Utah and is an artist and freelance writer.

Jim Frazer, originally from Atlanta, has been living and working as an artist in Salt Lake for the past seven years. He will be showing at the Finch Lane Gallery in Spring of 2007.

Kent Rigby, aka "Durango", is a registered architect and works at ajc architects. He is currently the Gallery Director for the Utah Arts Alliance. His work is represented at Contemporary Art and Design Gallery.

Shawn Rossiter is a self-taught artist who lives in Sugarhouse. He has been the editor of 15 Bytes since its inception in 2001.

Geoff Wichert is a professor of Art History at Snow College, as well as a glass and multi-media artist. He has been writing about art for over 25 years in regional, national and international publications.

15 Bytes is published monthly by Artists of Utah, a 501 (c) 3 non-profit organization located in Salt Lake City Utah. The opinions expressed in these articles are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of 15 Bytes or Artists of Utah. Our editions are published monthly on the first Wednesday of the month. Our deadline for submissions is the last Wednesday of the preceeding month.

Editor: Shawn Rossiter
Assitant Editor: Laura Durham